Can A Spouse Be Put Out During A Divorce Case?
The short answer is yes. The court can order that one
spouse be removed from the marital residence while the
other spouse can be granted exclusive possession of the
marital residence. In practicality, the process and end
result is not nearly that simple.
There first must be on file a verified petition or verified
complaint seeking that one spouse be temporarily evicted
from the marital residence. The court can order granting
exclusive possession to one spouse only in cases where the
physical or mental well being of either spouse or their
children is jeopardized by the occupancy of both parties.
The court will typically only make such a ruling upon due
notice to each party and after a full hearing. An
exception would be that the court may order exclusive
possession upon good cause shown, by way of injunction.
However, the former is much more common than the latter.
An order for exclusive possession has no effect on the
parties' homestead rights or marital property rights. The
order simply places one spouse in the marital residence and
temporarily bars the other spouse from being in the
property.
The requirements to have such an order entered are
stringent. The petitioner must show or demonstrate that
the physical or mental well being of either the movant or
the children is in jeopardy. A simple threshold would be
in the case of physical violence. In re the Marriage of
Hofstetter, husband's admission that he had beaten his wife
was sufficient to justify the award of exclusive possession
to his wife.
In other cases, the parties are simply living as roommates
within the same marital residence. In those instances, the
court will not order either party to leave the marital
residence. As long as the parties refrain from any type of
altercation, each has the right to remain in the premises.
In re the Marriage of Lombaer, wife's hospitalization for
mental problems and failure to take prescribed medication
were insufficient evidence to establish that the mental or
physical well being of the parties or the children would be
jeopardized by wife's presence in the home.
Thus, you can begin to understand the court's dilemma. Has
the petitioner shown the need for exclusive possession of
the marital residence? The court must balance the request
of the petitioner against the hardship that will be put on
the party being removed.
In many cases, both parties seek to remain in the marital
residence for economic reasons. Often times, it is not
until the divorce is final that the parties break free.
There may be significant equity in the property that cannot
be divided until the property is sold. It is often in both
parties' interest to remain in the martial residence until
that equity can be realized.
In conclusion, the path to obtaining exclusive possession
of the marital home is often difficult. However, under the
appropriate circumstances and with the assistance of a
skilled attorney, a party can be granted exclusive
possession of the marital residence.
----------------------------------------------------
David M. Siegel is an attorney practicing divorce and
family law. Additional information is available at
http://www.divorce-lawyers-newyork.com .
spouse be removed from the marital residence while the
other spouse can be granted exclusive possession of the
marital residence. In practicality, the process and end
result is not nearly that simple.
There first must be on file a verified petition or verified
complaint seeking that one spouse be temporarily evicted
from the marital residence. The court can order granting
exclusive possession to one spouse only in cases where the
physical or mental well being of either spouse or their
children is jeopardized by the occupancy of both parties.
The court will typically only make such a ruling upon due
notice to each party and after a full hearing. An
exception would be that the court may order exclusive
possession upon good cause shown, by way of injunction.
However, the former is much more common than the latter.
An order for exclusive possession has no effect on the
parties' homestead rights or marital property rights. The
order simply places one spouse in the marital residence and
temporarily bars the other spouse from being in the
property.
The requirements to have such an order entered are
stringent. The petitioner must show or demonstrate that
the physical or mental well being of either the movant or
the children is in jeopardy. A simple threshold would be
in the case of physical violence. In re the Marriage of
Hofstetter, husband's admission that he had beaten his wife
was sufficient to justify the award of exclusive possession
to his wife.
In other cases, the parties are simply living as roommates
within the same marital residence. In those instances, the
court will not order either party to leave the marital
residence. As long as the parties refrain from any type of
altercation, each has the right to remain in the premises.
In re the Marriage of Lombaer, wife's hospitalization for
mental problems and failure to take prescribed medication
were insufficient evidence to establish that the mental or
physical well being of the parties or the children would be
jeopardized by wife's presence in the home.
Thus, you can begin to understand the court's dilemma. Has
the petitioner shown the need for exclusive possession of
the marital residence? The court must balance the request
of the petitioner against the hardship that will be put on
the party being removed.
In many cases, both parties seek to remain in the marital
residence for economic reasons. Often times, it is not
until the divorce is final that the parties break free.
There may be significant equity in the property that cannot
be divided until the property is sold. It is often in both
parties' interest to remain in the martial residence until
that equity can be realized.
In conclusion, the path to obtaining exclusive possession
of the marital home is often difficult. However, under the
appropriate circumstances and with the assistance of a
skilled attorney, a party can be granted exclusive
possession of the marital residence.
----------------------------------------------------
David M. Siegel is an attorney practicing divorce and
family law. Additional information is available at
http://www.divorce-lawyers-newyork.com .

