Monday, June 30, 2008

When It's Time to Revisit The Support Order

How long has it been since your order for support was
entered before the court? Have circumstances changed since
that order for support was signed by the judge? Has there
been a significant change in circumstances such as job loss
or job enhancement? Has the need for support increased or
declined since the order for support was entered?

If you are like most people, you are currently operating
under a support order, which is currently out of touch.
Whatever the statutory guideline amounted to at the time
the order was entered; it's likely that the terms are not
being complied with, under the terms of the order. For
example, if the court ordered that 20% of the payor's net
income go towards the support of the minor child, and the
payor has had a significant increase in income since the
time the order was entered, the child is clearly not
receiving what the court nor the legislature intended the
child to receive. Play to counteract this, is to bring a
motion before the court for a modification and/or increase
in child support. The payor will have to produce proof of
income, which can include recent paycheck stubs, the most
recent year's income tax filing, and any other source of
income that he or she may have received in the last year.
The payor may be willing to submit this information
voluntarily or he or she may produce such information only
after the filing of a subpoena to produce such documents.
In any event, once the information is provided, the
attorney for the payee can make an educated estimate of
what the proper amount of support calculates to at the
present date.

The payee may be surprised to see that the payor's income
has increased significantly. The payor may be shocked that
he or she must pay an additional amount per month then what
was originally ordered by the court.

The bottom line is that the court and the legislature
provided a means to determine the proper amount of support.
The court also provided the means to go back to court and
have the amount adjusted for present day circumstances.
The payor also has the ability to petition the court for a
proper reduction is circumstances have changed. The goal
is to simply get the proper percentage corrected. The goal
is not to provide an arena for protracted litigation on the
issue of support.


----------------------------------------------------
New York City divorce and family law firm handling divorce
and family law cases throughout New York City and the
surrounding areas. Results driven law firm with experience
and skill to handle the most difficult cases.
http://www.divorce-lawyers-newyork.com

Monday, June 23, 2008

Lawyer Advertising Revealed: How To Find And Hire A Battle-Hardened Personal Injury Attorney

Attorney advertising is everywhere--in the phone book, on
the internet, in magazines, on television, and in every
other type of media imaginable. Personal injury attorneys
obviously account for most legal advertising. In fact,
personal injury attorneys probably account for more popular
media advertisements than all other types of lawyers
combined. In an odd twist, however, most good personal
injury lawyers (the ones with lots of trial experience and
good reputations among the bar and with judges) have little
need for expensive advertising. They don't need to
advertise, because clients are referred to them. On the
other hand, lawyers with limited trial skills who advertise
heavily and give the impression that they are experienced
saddle the legal profession with a bad name. They are the
ambulance chasers.

The main problem with personal injury attorney advertising
is that it is too powerful, which is not a new idea. The
United States Supreme Court has ruled that attorney
advertising can be so powerful as to warrant restrictions
on its use, despite free speech guarantees in the federal
Constitution. Indeed, every state bar association of which
this author is aware places restrictions on attorney
advertising to curtail its persuasive effect. But the fact
that so many injured people continue to hire advertising
attorneys is evidence that restrictions on advertisements
are not working. Courts and bar associations are unlikely
to place additional restrictions on advertising attorneys,
so what else can be done?

This article attempts to do two things: (1) expose
advertising attorneys and the personal injury industry and
(2) educate the general public on how to find ethical,
experienced, talented, and proven trial attorneys. But
exposure of the industry and educational materials will be
valuable only to the extent that they are not "drowned out"
by the work of advertising attorneys. The point of this
article is to provide much needed information to injured
people in need of excellent legal representation--people
who almost always miss the ramifications of hiring
attorneys who are heavily advertised.

When attorneys advertise on television, in the Yellow
Pages, or in other mediums, they incur high overhead
expenses. In addition to high marketing expenses,
advertising attorneys hire additional employees to answer
phones, screen potential clients, conduct intakes (or "free
consultations"), gather client records, and manage a large
number of cases. As a result, advertising attorneys are
under tremendous pressure to generate cash for payroll and
advertising expenses.

The pressure to generate cash flow forces advertising
attorneys to settle cases quickly. These lawyers are
reluctant to take cases to trial, because trial can be a
long and expensive process. Here's the rub: Insurance
companies and defense attorneys know which personal injury
lawyers are willing to take cases to trial and which ones
have a reputation for settling cases quickly. As a result,
insurance companies often "low ball" advertising attorneys.
Advertising attorneys, in turn, are forced to recommend
that their clients accept less than fair value for their
claims. Most clients are easily persuaded to take what
they can get, and the cycle continues.

On rare occasions, a client may simply refuse to settle.
Advertising attorneys often refer those clients to skilled
trial attorneys. At this point, it's important to
distinguish between types of attorneys. Advertising
attorneys are skilled marketers who spend time learning how
to sell their services via advertising. An experienced
trial attorney, on the other hand, is an expert advocate
who spends time developing and honing trial skills and
maintaining a good reputation with the local bar
association. These attorneys are respected by insurance
companies and defense lawyers alike, because they are not
afraid to file suit and follow through with trial, which
adds value to settlement offers out of the gate.

Now that advertising attorneys are exposed, here's how you
can find a battle-hardened, ethical, and talented trial
attorney:

Begin your search with an elite organization or association
of trial lawyers. The American Board of Trial Advocates is
a good example. Seek attorneys who hold leadership
positions in this and other associations of trial lawyers.

Research attorneys on the bar association website for your
state. Look for attorneys who are board certified in civil
trial law (or in the specific field for which you need a
lawyer).

Research attorneys on their personal or firm websites.
Look for the jury verdicts obtained by the attorney you're
considering.

Ask friends, family members, and other attorneys for
personal recommendations.

Ask lots of questions at your consultations with attorneys.
Make sure the attorney you're considering has handled a
case similar to yours and ask about the outcome of that
case. Let the attorney know that you're not asking for or
expecting a guaranteed result for your own case. Also ask
about the number of cases the attorney takes to trial each
year and the percentage of cases that settle out of court.
Here, you're looking for an indication that the attorney is
willing to abandon settlement negotiations if they're not
going well and proceed to trial.

Do not begin your search with the phone book or by calling
an attorney advertised on television. Only call an
advertising attorney after you've done your homework and
determined that he or she is well qualified to handle your
case and willing to take it to trial if settlement
negotiations are unsuccessful. One final word to the wise,
attorney referral services often simply rotate the
attorneys they recommend. If you are referred to a
personal injury lawyer by a friend, family member, other
attorney, or referral service, you still need to do your
homework.

Armed with this information, you are much more likely to
find and hire an attorney who can and will add value to
your personal injury case. Good luck!


----------------------------------------------------
Michael Patton graduated from Vanderbilt University Law
School in the top 10% of his class. He worked as an extern
clerk for the Delaware Supreme Court and served as
Associate Editor on the Vanderbilt Law Review. Michael's
experience as a personal injury attorney prompted him to
write What You Must Know (And Ask) Before Hiring A Personal
Injury Attorney, which is available at
http://www.TheInjuryAdvisor.com or
http://www.FloridaCrashLaw.com

Monday, June 16, 2008

The Truth Behind Some Cheesy Lawyer TV Ads

Did you know that here are companies that offer prewritten
and pre-shot TV commercials for personal injury attorneys?
You've probably seen one of these canned ads. Sometimes a
famous actor is used (such as William Shatner or Eric
Estrada or someone who plays a lawyer on a popular TV
show). Other times an attractive man or woman is shown
speaking behind a desk, standing in front of a shelf full
of law books. or holding a legal book, standing in a
courtroom, or doing something else to make them look like a
lawyer. Attorneys can buy these ads and then have their
name, phone number and web address inserted into the ad.

The ads usually go something like--If you've been in an
accident, get the money you deserve. Speak to an attorney
for free. Call 1-800-XXXXXXX. The ads are running all over
the US in large cities and small towns.

They often target specific types of cases such as car
accidents, asbestos, medical malpractice, workmens
compensation, trucking accidents, divorce, family law, etc.

What you need to know is that if you respond to one of
these ads more often than not your call will be routed to a
call center where operators answer the calls. Or to an
out-of-state law office that then hands off your case to
one of its in-state associates. In either scenario the
attorney that you actually end up speaking with may or may
not have the skills and experience that you need. Your
call is being routed to the next attorney in line, so to
speak.

The next in line is an attorney who has paid a fee to be a
part of the network. Any attorney with enough money can pay
to be on the list, including attorneys who have never tried
a case in court. Many times the attorney who has paid the
fee is not necessarily the best lawyer for your case.

I'm not saying that all attorneys who use TV advertising
are inexperienced or that all attorney ads are routed in
this way. Do your home work to figure out the difference
and find the right attorney for your case. Search the web,
read articles, visit websites, watch videos, talk to
friends, and visit more than one attorney's office before
you make your final decision. You should not rely on TV
advertising alone when choosing a lawyer.


----------------------------------------------------
Mr. Davis is the founder of the Davis Law Group. He brings
over 15 years of practical yet innovative experience to
personal injury cases. He practices law in Seattle, WA.
http://www.InjuryTrialLawyer.com . Mr. Davis is the author
of "The Ten Biggest Mistakes That Can Wreck Your Washington
Accident Case" complimentary copies are available at
http://www.washingtonaccidentbook.com

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Mesothelioma and Wrongful Death Lawsuits

A wrongful death lawsuit is one in which the plaintiff or
claimant brings legal action in a civil court of law, on
behalf of an individual who has died as a result of the
negligence of action of another individual or party. This
type of lawsuit can be coupled with mesothelioma
litigation, due to the unfortunate fact that the result of
many mesothelioma cases can in fact be the death of the
victim. Therefore, anyone who believes they have occasion
to file a mesothelioma lawsuit may need to consider the
reality of filing a mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit.

Why File A Mesothelioma Wrongful Death Lawsuit?

The death of a loved one as a result of any disease is
always terrible for the family of the victim, however that
pain can be made even more difficult to bear when the
disease and death come as a result of the negligence or
action of a third party. Fortunately, with the help of an
experienced wrongful death lawyer, families of individuals
who have died can seek compensation for the loss they have
suffered, and the suffering that their loved one endured.
In the case of mesothelioma, a particularly serious form of
lung cancer that is nearly always associated with exposure
to the dangerous environmental toxin asbestos, often in a
workplace environment.

Because of the fact that mesothelioma is so serious a form
of lung cancer, the ultimately outcome of the disease if
often the death of the patient. Families of mesothelioma
victims therefore should consider speaking with a qualified
mesothelioma lawyer about the possibility of filing a
mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit, even in the case that
the mesothelioma victim has not yet succumbed to this
serious lung disease.

What Can You Expect from A Mesothelioma Wrongful Death
Lawsuit?

Beginning in the twentieth century, there is a long history
of mesothelioma litigation, with a lengthy precedence of
the negligence and responsibility for those companies that
manufactured asbestos or placed their employees in direct
contact with it. Therefore, the family of any individual
who has died as a result of mesothelioma cause by exposure
to asbestos can expect some compensation in a mesothelioma
wrongful death lawsuit. In order to properly understand
what this compensation might entail, it can be in an
individual's best interest to contact an expert
mesothelioma wrongful death lawyer to better understand how
a mesothelioma wrongful death lawsuit could provide
compensation for any loss that has been suffered.


----------------------------------------------------
LegalView.com is your source for everything legal on the
web. At http://www.legalview.com/ , readers can view
information on a variety of issues regarding mesothelioma,
such as a mesothelioma lawsuit or help to find a
mesothelioma law firm. To access this mesothelioma
information please visit http://mesothelioma.legalview.com/
.

Wednesday, June 04, 2008

A Bankruptcy Attorney's Perspective

One of the most rewarding things about being a bankruptcy
attorney is the ability to help people. I am really not
interested in how people got into debt. That fact really
doesn't matter to me. Whether it was from an illness,
injury, job loss, divorce, overspending, or simply bad
financial decisions, the situation remains the same. It
may become important going forward in the future to that
person. He may not want to travel down the same road that
brought him into bankruptcy. For example, someone who did
not have medical insurance and has a chronic illness may
continue to incur medical bills that are uncovered in the
future. For that person, he needs to make a change in his
life, so that he doesn't become a victim to debt in the
future.

I am much more interested in how I can help this person get
out of debt. The overwhelming majority of people qualify
under Chapter 7 of the U.S. bankruptcy code. Chapter 7 is
known as a fresh start or liquidation bankruptcy, however,
not much ever gets liquidated. Most of the people filing
for Chapter 7 bankruptcy have very little in the way of
assets, very little in the way of income, in terms of being
able to repay their debt and in fact, do receive a fresh
start. In recent times, since the law change in October
2005, it has become more difficult for anyone to file a
Chapter 7 fresh start bankruptcy case. That being said,
the overwhelming majority of people approximately 85%, in
fact, still qualify and receive a Chapter 7 bankruptcy
discharge. The other 15% of potential applicants, are
either not eligible for Chapter 7 or their Chapter 7 gets
dismissed upon motion of the United States trustee. What
happens in those cases is the person either switches to a
Chapter 13 and does some form of reorganization under the
Bankruptcy code or simply allows the Chapter 7 case to
dismiss. That debtor is then eligible to possible file a
bankruptcy at a later time in his life. The U.S. trustee's
office at the national and local level does keep statistics
on how many chapter seven bankruptcy cases are dismissed
and how much total that is determined to be
non-dischargeable. What is still unknown is what
percentage of that debt becomes collected in the future by
the creditors.

What I think is happening is simply Chapter 7 debtors who
are turned down are finding alternative ways to deal with
the creditors and continue to live their lives. There is a
percentage, of course, that will file a Chapter 13
bankruptcy and reorganize and pay the creditors something
back (somewhere between 10% and 100%).


----------------------------------------------------
David M. Siegel is the author of Chapter 7 Success: The
Complete Guide to Surviving Personal Bankruptcy. He is a
member of the American Bankruptcy Institute and currently
practices bankruptcy law in Chicago and its surrounding
suburbs. Additional information is available at
http://www.chapter7success.com .